New Client Alert Explains IRA and Retirement Plan Limits for 2013 - October 22, 2012

IRA contribution limits

The maximum amount you can contribute to a traditional IRA or Roth IRA in 2013 increases to $5,500 (or 100% of your earned income, if less), up from $5,000 in 2012. The maximum catch-up contribution for those age 50 or older remains at $1,000. (You can contribute to both a traditional and Roth IRA in 2013, but your total contributions can't exceed this annual limit.)

Traditional IRA deduction limits for 2013

The income limits for determining the deductibility of traditional IRA contributions have also increased for 2013 (for those covered by employer retirement plans). For example, you can fully deduct your IRA contribution if your filing status is single/head of household, and your income ("modified adjusted gross income," or MAGI) is $59,000 or less (up from $58,000 in 2012). If you're married and filing a joint return, you can fully deduct your IRA contribution if your MAGI is $95,000 or less (up from $92,000 in 2012). If you're not covered by an employer plan but your spouse is, and you file a joint return, you can fully deduct your IRA contribution if your MAGI is $178,000 or less (up from $173,000 in 2012).

If your 2013 federal income tax filing status is:	Your IRA deduction is reduced if your MAGI is between:	Your deduction is eliminated if your MAGI is:
Single or head of household	$59,000 and $69,000	$69,000 or more
Married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er)*	$95,000 and $115,000 (combined)	$115,000 or more (combined)
Married filing separately	$0 and $10,000	$10,000 or more

*If you're not covered by an employer plan but your spouse is, your deduction is limited if your MAGI is $178,000 to $188,000, and eliminated if your MAGI exceeds $188,000.

Roth IRA contribution limits for 2013

The income limits for determining how much you can contribute to a Roth IRA have also increased. If your filing status is single/head of household, you can contribute the full $5,500 to a Roth IRA in 2013 if your MAGI is $112,000 or less (up from $110,000 in 2012). And if you're married and filing a joint return, you can make a full contribution if your MAGI is $178,000 or less (up from $173,000 in 2012). (Again, contributions can't exceed 100% of your earned income.)

If your 2013 federal income tax filing status is:	Your Roth IRA contribution is reduced if your MAGI is:	You cannot contribute to a Roth IRA if your MAGI is:
Single or head of household	More than $112,000 but less than $127,000	$127,000 or more
Married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er)	More than $178,000 but less than $188,000 (combined)	$188,000 or more (combined)
Married filing separately	More than $0 but less than $10,000	$10,000 or more

Employer retirement plans

The maximum amount you can contribute (your "elective deferrals") to a 401(k) plan has increased for 2013. The limit (which also applies to 403(b), 457(b), and SAR-SEP plans, as well as the Federal Thrift Plan) is $17,500 in 2013 (up from $17,000 in 2012). If you're age 50 or older, you can also make catch-up contributions of up to $5,500 to these plans in 2013 (unchanged from 2012). (Special catch-up limits apply to certain participants in 403(b) and 457(b) plans.)

If you participate in more than one retirement plan, your total elective deferrals can't exceed the annual limit ($17,500 in 2013 plus any applicable catch-up contribution). Deferrals to 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, SIMPLE plans, and SAR-SEPs are included in this limit, but deferrals to Section 457(b) plans are not. For example, if you participate in both a 403(b) plan and a 457(b) plan, you can defer the full dollar limit to each plan--a total of $35,000 in 2013 (plus any catch-up contributions).

The amount you can contribute to a SIMPLE IRA or SIMPLE 401(k) plan has increased to $12,000 for 2013, up from $11,500 in 2012. The catch-up limit for those age 50 or older remains unchanged at $2,500.

Plan type:	Annual dollar limit:	Catch-up limit:
401(k), 403(b), governmental 457(b), SAR-SEP, Federal Thrift Plan	$17,500	$5,500
SIMPLE plans	$12,000	$2,500

Note: Contributions can't exceed 100% of your income.

The maximum amount that can be allocated to your account in a defined contribution plan (for example, a 401(k) plan or profit-sharing plan) in 2013 is $51,000 (up from $50,000 in 2012), plus age-50 catch-up contributions. (This includes both your contributions and your employer's contributions. Special rules apply if your employer sponsors more than one retirement plan.)

Finally, the maximum amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining benefits for most plans has increased to $255,000, up from $250,000 in 2012; and the dollar threshold for determining highly compensated employees remains unchanged at $115,000.

December 2010 Schnack Financial Newsletter

"Hi,

The opening paragraph of the report of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform reads as follows: Throughout our nation’s history, Americans have found the courage to do right by our children’s future. Deep down, every American knows we face a moment of truth once again. We cannot play games or put off hard choices any longer. Without regard to party, we have a patriotic duty to keep the promise of America to give our children and grandchildren a better life.

Every American should read it."
FULL REPORT


--Randy

Financial Tips for Twenty-Somethings You're on your own now. You've finished school, are working your first real job, and maybe you're even buying a home or getting married. Here are a few tips to help you start managing your finances. More Details

Cash-In Refinancing: Can You Benefit from This Growing Trend? Mortgage interest rates are at or near historic lows, but stricter lending standards and declining home values have made it harder to refinance. Enter cash-in refinancing. More Details

Fixed Annuities vs. CDs: Is One Better Than the Other? While some features are similar, fixed annuities and bank certificates of deposit (CDs) also have characteristics that differ. What works for you may depend on which of these factors best fits your financial situation and investment objectives. More Details

Can I roll over my traditional 401(k) plan distribution to a Roth IRA? You can roll most traditional 401(k) plan distributions to a Roth IRA. These are treated as taxable conversions. More Details Can I roll over my Roth 401(k) plan distribution to a Roth IRA? You can roll your Roth 401(k) plan distribution over to a Roth IRA. Your rollover will be tax free regardless of whether your distribution from the Roth 401(k) plan is qualified or nonqualified. More Details

Roth Conversions - 2010

You've probably heard a lot of talk about the Roth IRA Conversion changes in 2010. Click the link below to find out more and then give us a call.

Roth IRA Conversions 2010

Deadline Rapidly Approaching to Recharacterize 2008 Roth Conversions

Did you convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2008 only to see your new Roth IRA balance decline due to market conditions? If so, you may want to consider recharacterizing your conversion. A recharacterization essentially allows you to undo the conversion and treat it as if it never occurred. But you must act quickly--the deadline for recharacterizing 2008 conversions is October 15, 2009.

Why would you want to recharacterize your conversion? When you convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, you're taxed as if you received a distribution on the conversion date. But if your Roth IRA has suffered a significant loss since the conversion, you wind up paying tax on assets that no longer exist. A recharacterization lets you undo the conversion, and may result in significant tax savings.

You would also want to recharacterize if you converted a traditional IRA to a Roth in 2008 and then found you weren't eligible to convert because your 2008 income exceeded the $100,000 limit that applies to conversions before 2010.

If you recharacterize your Roth 2008 conversion in 2009, you'll be able to reconvert your traditional IRA to a Roth after waiting at least 30 days following the date of the recharacterization. In addition, if you reconvert in 2010, you'll be eligible for a special rule that allows you to report half of the resulting income on your 2011 tax return, and the other half on your 2012 tax return.

Example(s): Mary converted a $100,000 traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in June 2008. She filed for a federal income tax extension, giving her until October 15, 2009, to file her 2008 federal return. But Mary's IRA is currently worth only $60,000--it has lost 40 percent of its value since the conversion. Nevertheless, Mary must pay income taxes based on the conversion date value of $100,000. She has until October 15, 2009, to recharacterize her conversion, and avoid paying federal income taxes on the $100,000. (If Mary has already filed her 2008 income tax return and paid the taxes on a timely basis, she can file an amended return for a refund, as long as she recharacterizes the conversion by October 15.) Mary can again convert her traditional IRA to a Roth IRA after waiting 30 days from the date of the recharacterization.

To recharacterize a 2008 conversion, you need to carefully follow specific IRS rules. Your financial professional can help you determine if a recharacterization, or reconversion, is right for you, and help guide you through the procedural requirements.

--see disclaimer below--

Roth IRA Conversions--Planning for New Opportunities

With the lure of tax-free distributions, Roth IRAs have become popular retirement savings vehicles since their introduction in 1998. But if you're a high-income taxpayer, chances are you haven't been able to participate in the Roth revolution. Well, that's about to change.

What are the current rules?

There are currently three ways to fund a Roth IRA--you can contribute directly, you can convert all or part of a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, or you can roll funds over from an eligible employer retirement plan (more on this third method later.)

In general, you can contribute up to $5,000 to an IRA (traditional, Roth, or a combination of both) in 2008 and 2009. If you're age 50 or older, you can contribute up to $6,000 in 2008 and 2009. (Note, though, that your contributions can't exceed your earned income for the year.)

But your ability to contribute directly to a Roth IRA depends on your income level ("modified adjusted gross income," or MAGI), as shown in the chart below:

If your federal filing status is:	Your 2009 Roth IRA contribution is reduced if your MAGI is:	You can't contribute to a Roth IRA for 2009 if your MAGI is:
Single or head of household	More than $105,000 but less than $120,000	$120,000 or more
Married filing jointly or qualifying widow(er)	More than $166,000 but less than $176,000	$176,000 or more
Married filing separately	More than $0 but less than $10,000	$10,000 or more

Regardless of whether you contribute directly to a Roth IRA, if your MAGI is $100,000 or less, and you're single or married filing jointly, you can convert an existing traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. (You'll have to pay income tax on the taxable portion of your traditional IRA at the time of conversion.) But if you're married filing separately, or your MAGI exceeds $100,000, you aren't allowed to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

What's changing?

In 2006, President Bush signed the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act (TIPRA) into law. TIPRA repeals the $100,000 income limit for conversions, and also allows conversions by taxpayers who are married filing separately. What this means is that, regardless of your filing status or how much you earn, you'll be able to convert a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. The bad news? This provision of the new law doesn't take effect until 2010.

So why concern yourself with this now?

Even though the new rules don't take effect until 2010, there are steps you can take now if you want to maximize the amount you can convert at that time. If you aren't doing so already, you can simply start making the maximum annual contribution to a traditional IRA, and then convert that traditional IRA to a Roth in 2010.

Your ability to make deductible contributions to a traditional IRA may be limited if you (or your spouse) is covered by an employer retirement plan and your income exceeds certain limits. But any taxpayer, regardless of income level or retirement plan participation, can make nondeductible contributions to a traditional IRA until age 70½. And because nondeductible contributions aren't subject to income tax when you convert your traditional IRA to a Roth IRA, they make sense for taxpayers contemplating a 2010 conversion even if they're eligible to make deductible contributions.

And don't forget that SEP IRAs and SIMPLE IRAs (after two years of participation) can also be converted to Roth IRAs. You may want to consider maximizing your contributions to these IRAs now, and then converting them to Roth IRAs in 2010. (You'll need to set up a new IRA to receive any additional SEP or SIMPLE contributions after you convert.)

But there's a taxing problem

If you've made only nondeductible contributions to your traditional IRA, then only the earnings, and not your own contributions, will be subject to tax at the time you convert the IRA to a Roth.

But if you've made both deductible and nondeductible IRA contributions to your traditional IRA, and you don't plan on converting the entire amount, things can get complicated.

That's because under IRS rules, you can't just convert the nondeductible contributions to a Roth and avoid paying tax at conversion. Instead, the amount you convert is deemed to consist of a pro-rata portion of the taxable and nontaxable dollars in the IRA.

For example, assume that in 2010 your traditional IRA that contains $350,000 of taxable (deductible) contributions, $100,000 of taxable earnings, and $50,000 of nontaxable (nondeductible) contributions. You can't convert only the $50,000 nondeductible (nontaxable) contributions to a Roth. Instead, you'll need to prorate the taxable and nontaxable portions of the account. So in the example above, 90% ($450,000/$500,000) of each distribution from the IRA in 2010 (including any conversion) will be taxable, and 10% will be nontaxable.

You can't escape this result by using separate IRAs. The IRS makes you aggregate all your traditional IRAs (including SEPs and SIMPLEs) when calculating the taxes due whenever you take a distribution from (or convert) any of the IRAs.

But for every glitch, there's a potential workaround. In this case, one way to avoid the prorating requirement, and to ensure you convert only nontaxable dollars, is to first roll over all of your taxable IRA money (that is, your deductible contributions and earnings) to an employer retirement plan like a 401(k) (assuming you have access to an employer plan that accepts rollovers). This will leave only the nontaxable money in your traditional IRA, which you can then convert to a Roth IRA tax free. (You can leave the taxable IRA money in the employer plan, or roll it back over to an IRA at a later date.)

But even if you have to pay tax at conversion, TIPRA contains more good news--if you make a conversion in 2010, you'll be able to report half the income from the conversion on your 2011 tax return and the other half on your 2012 return.

For example, if your only traditional IRA contains $250,000 of taxable dollars (your deductible contributions and earnings) and $175,000 of nontaxable dollars (your nondeductible contributions), and you convert the entire amount to a Roth IRA in 2010, you'll report half of the income ($125,000) in 2011, and the other half ($125,000) in 2012.

And speaking of employer retirement plans...

Before 2008, you couldn't roll funds over from a 401(k) or other eligible employer plan directly to a Roth IRA unless the dollars came from a Roth 401(k) account or a Roth 403(b) account. In order to get a distribution of non-Roth dollars from your employer plan into a Roth IRA you needed to first roll the funds over to a traditional IRA and then (if you met the income limits and other requirements) convert the traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. And, as described earlier, you needed to aggregate all your traditional IRAs to determine how much income tax you owed when you converted the traditional IRA.

The Pension Protection Act of 2006 streamlined this process. Now, you can simply roll over a distribution of non-Roth dollars from a 401(k) or other eligible plan directly (or indirectly in a 60-day rollover) to a Roth IRA. You'll still need to meet the $100,000 income limit for 2008 and 2009. And you'll still need to pay income tax on any taxable dollars rolled over.

One benefit of this new procedure is that you can avoid the proration rule, since you're not converting a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. This can be helpful if you have nontaxable money in the employer plan and your goal is to minimize the taxes you'll pay when you convert.

For example, assume you receive a $100,000 distribution from your 401(k) plan, and $40,000 is nontaxable because you've made after-tax contributions. You can roll the $60,000 over tax free to a traditional IRA, and then roll the after-tax balance ($40,000) over to a Roth IRA. Since only after-tax dollars are contributed to the Roth IRA, this rollover is also tax free. (Both your plan's terms, and the order in which you make the rollovers, may be important, so be sure to consult a qualified professional.)

Is a Roth conversion right for you?

The answer to this question depends on many factors, including your income tax rate, the length of time you can leave the funds in the Roth IRA without taking withdrawals, your state's tax laws, and how you'll pay the income taxes due at the time of the conversion. And don't forget--if you make a Roth conversion and it turns out not to be advantageous, IRS rules allow you to "undo" the conversion (within certain time limits).

We can help you decide whether a Roth conversion is right for you, and help you plan for this exciting new retirement savings opportunity.

-see disclaimer below-